1
3
02:03
That Explains Things: Gangbang Queen And Sperm Dumpster, Lily Phillips Says She's Been Watching Porn Since She's Been 11
1
3
0
"unRELIABLE SOURCES":CNN Blatantly Changes Harvard's Media Research Findings on Media Bias in Order to Slander Fox News
00:00 / 00:00
00:38
NEW YORK SHITTY UPDATE: Man Wanted By NYC Police For Having Sex With A Corpse On The Subway
0
1
0
02:04
An Unhinged Liberal Lunatic Harasses And Threatens A Guy Wearing A Trump Hat At A Boston College Campus
3
11
0
01:24
POS Degenerate Brutally Assaults A Mexican Restaurant Worker
0
3
0
00:12
Wretched, Liberal White Woman Declares Her Infant Son Gay
0
4
0
02:34
The Nutcase Tried To Rob A Hotel While Wearing His Birthday Suit
1
0
0
01:23
Parents Freak Out After Seeing Hidden Camera Showing Daycare Worker Abusing A 3-Year-Old Child
0
3
0
John Berman strayed into questionable territory Sunday while discussing a recent Harvard study on the media’s coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office.
“Is the White House besieged by crisis, or is President Trump besieged by the media attempting a sort of coup?” Berman posed to his CNN audience. “It really all depends on where you turn your dial to get your news. This is according to a new study from the Harvard Shorenstein Center on Media Politics that analyzed news coverage of the President’s first 100 days and found that the coverage quote ‘set a new standard for unfavorable coverage of a President, with Fox News being the only outlet where the majority of the coverage was positive.”
CNN then displayed the following graphic, captioned, “FOX NEWS ONLY OUTLET WITH OVERWHELMINGLY POSITIVE COVERAGE.”
There’s just one problem.
Those numbers only reflect a portion of the study’s findings, specifically the breakdown of news reports regarding the president’s fitness for office.
