0
3
00:20
Motorcyclist Almost Sees The Pearly Gates When A Car Almost Sends Him Flying Off And Overpass
0
3
0
"unRELIABLE SOURCES":CNN Blatantly Changes Harvard's Media Research Findings on Media Bias in Order to Slander Fox News
13:34
The Way Mossad Got Hezbollah To Buy Exploding Walkie-Talkies Is INSANE
5
1
0
00:30
AWESOME!!! A UFO Enters Into A Portal In Germany
4
3
0
00:12
Customers At A Los Angeles At An In-N-Out Burger Freak Out As A Half-Naked Nutjob Stabs The Windows
1
1
0
00:33
The Degenerate TikToker Who Destroyed A Million Dollars Worth Of Food With Poison At A Supermarket Was Doing This Crap At A Laundromat
1
6
0
00:19
Illegal Migrant Sets Fire To Woman On New York City Subway As Disturbing Video Goes Viral
0
6
0
00:23
Big Fat Lady Who Didn't Like The Portions At Chipotle Helped Herself Behind The Counter
2
3
0
John Berman strayed into questionable territory Sunday while discussing a recent Harvard study on the media’s coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office.
“Is the White House besieged by crisis, or is President Trump besieged by the media attempting a sort of coup?” Berman posed to his CNN audience. “It really all depends on where you turn your dial to get your news. This is according to a new study from the Harvard Shorenstein Center on Media Politics that analyzed news coverage of the President’s first 100 days and found that the coverage quote ‘set a new standard for unfavorable coverage of a President, with Fox News being the only outlet where the majority of the coverage was positive.”
CNN then displayed the following graphic, captioned, “FOX NEWS ONLY OUTLET WITH OVERWHELMINGLY POSITIVE COVERAGE.”
There’s just one problem.
Those numbers only reflect a portion of the study’s findings, specifically the breakdown of news reports regarding the president’s fitness for office.
