Mystery X Account Sparks Frenzy After ‘Predicting’ White House Dinner Shooter Years in Advance

A bizarre online mystery has gripped social media after users uncovered an X account that appears to have named the alleged gunman in a high-profile Washington, D.C., shooting more than two years before the incident occurred.

The account, operating under the handle “HenryMa79561893” and linked to the name Henry Martinez, has just a single post.

That post, dated December 21, 2023, contains only a name: Cole Allen.

Allen is now identified as the alleged gunman involved in the April 2026 security incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where shots were fired inside the Washington Hilton, prompting the evacuation of Donald Trump and senior officials.

The eerie совпадение has sent online sleuths into overdrive, with many questioning how a seemingly inactive account could have posted the name of a suspect years before the shooting took place.

Adding another layer to the intrigue, users have pointed to a possible real-world connection.

Screenshots circulating online suggest that a man named Henry Martinez was listed as an author on a NASA Goddard conference paper around 2015, associated with Lockheed Martin.

That timeline has raised eyebrows because Allen is reported to have participated in a NASA-related internship around 2014, leading some to speculate about a potential overlap in professional or academic circles.

However, no official confirmation has been provided linking the X account to the individual associated with the NASA publication, or establishing any verified connection between Martinez and Allen.

Authorities have not commented on the online claims.

Experts caution that coincidences involving common names and limited online data can easily be misinterpreted, especially when amplified across social media platforms.

Despite the uncertainty, the post has gone viral, fueling speculation and conspiracy theories as users attempt to piece together a timeline that, at first glance, appears unsettling.

Whether the account represents an extraordinary coincidence, a misidentified individual, or something else entirely remains unclear.

For now, the unanswered questions continue to circulate, leaving many wondering how a single, cryptic post could spark such widespread intrigue.